UNTOLD · Body · NO. B01

The Cold War Inside Your Nose

The misery of a cold is not the virus at work. It is your own immune system fighting back.

Share
The Cold War Inside Your Nose

It starts small. A faint scratch at the back of the throat when you swallow, easy to dismiss as dry air or a bad night’s sleep. By the afternoon the throat has turned raw, the nose has begun to run, and a dull ache has settled behind the eyes. By evening you feel wrecked, wrapped in a blanket, certain that some invisible enemy is doing terrible things to your body.

Here is the strange truth. The virus that caused all this is doing almost nothing to harm you directly. The scratchy throat, the streaming nose, the fatigue, the low fever: none of these are the work of the invader. They are the work of your own body, fighting a war on your behalf. What you experience as sickness is not damage. It is defense.

The common cold is the most familiar illness on Earth and, in a curious way, one of the most misunderstood. The average adult catches two to three colds a year, and children catch far more 1. Over a lifetime that adds up to something like two hundred infections, two hundred small campaigns waged inside the nose and throat. And despite more than a century of research, thousands of volunteers, and some of the strangest experiments in the history of medicine, we still cannot cure a single one.

A single particle on the lining of the nose

Every cold begins with a landing. A virus particle, so small that millions could sit on a pinhead, settles onto the moist lining just inside the nostril. Most often the particle belongs to a rhinovirus, the family responsible for up to half of all common colds worldwide 2. Rhinoviruses have a particular fondness for the cooler air just inside the nose, where temperatures run a few degrees below the body’s core. That preference is not an accident. It shapes where the infection takes hold and why the nose, rather than the lungs, becomes the first battleground.

The rhinovirus was first pinned down in 1956 by Winston Price, a researcher who isolated the virus from a sick nurse and demonstrated that a whole family of tiny particles lay behind most colds 3. Before Price, the cause of the common cold had been suspected but never cleanly identified. His work opened a door onto a vast and frustrating landscape: not one virus, but a sprawling family of them, and behind that family still more families. Today we know that more than two hundred distinct viruses can produce the symptoms we lump together as a cold, and that rhinoviruses alone come in more than one hundred sixty known types 4.

Once a rhinovirus reaches a cell in the nasal lining, it does what all viruses do. It slips inside, hijacks the cell’s machinery, and forces it to manufacture thousands of copies of itself. Each new copy bursts out to infect neighboring cells, and the process repeats. Within hours a single particle has become an army. And yet, remarkably, this cellular takeover on its own produces very little of what we recognize as illness. The rhinovirus is a poor destroyer. It does not shred tissue or poison the blood. If the virus were the only thing happening, you might barely notice it.

The alarm bells ring

The misery begins when your body notices the intrusion. Infected cells, sensing that something has gone wrong, release a burst of chemical alarm signals called cytokines. These are the messengers of the immune system, tiny proteins that summon defensive cells to the site of trouble and coordinate the response 5. Cytokines are the reason a cold feels like a cold. They are the sirens that turn a quiet infection into a full mobilization.

When the alarm sounds, blood vessels in the nose dilate and begin to leak fluid into the surrounding tissue. That swelling is what you feel as congestion, the maddening blockage that makes breathing through the nose impossible. Meanwhile the nose floods with mucus, a deliberate flushing mechanism designed to trap virus particles and wash them out. The runny nose you resent is not a malfunction. It is drainage, an attempt to physically expel the invaders before they can spread.

Few people understood this better than Jack Gwaltney, who spent decades at the University of Virginia studying the biology of the common cold. Gwaltney and his colleagues showed that most of the discomfort of a cold arises not from the virus destroying tissue but from the inflammatory response the body mounts against it 6. The symptoms, in his framing, were the immune reaction itself. A protein called bradykinin, released during inflammation, turned out to be a major culprit behind that raw, burning soreness in the throat. Provoke the release of bradykinin in a healthy volunteer, and you can reproduce the sore throat of a cold without any virus at all.

The same logic explains the more dramatic symptoms. A sneeze is a reflexive attempt to blast irritants and invaders out of the nasal passages, and it does so with astonishing force, launching a spray of droplets across a considerable distance. Coughing serves a parallel purpose lower down, clearing the airways of mucus laden with virus particles. Both reflexes evolved to protect the individual, and both, inconveniently, also serve the virus by scattering it into the air for the next host. What feels like your body betraying you is really your body doing exactly what it was built to do, with a side effect the virus has learned to exploit.

Even fever, when it appears, is a calculated move rather than a symptom of being overwhelmed. The body raises its own internal thermostat, deliberately warming the tissues to a temperature that slows viral replication while speeding up the immune cells hunting the invader 7. A mild fever is not the illness winning. It is the body changing the terms of the fight, making its own interior a hostile place for the virus to live.

The strange experiments in the cottages

Much of what we understand about how colds spread and progress comes from one of the most peculiar research programs in modern medicine. From 1946 until its closure in 1989, Britain ran a facility known as the Common Cold Unit, on the grounds of a former military hospital near Salisbury 8. Volunteers arrived to stay in isolated cottages, kept apart from one another and from the outside world, where researchers deliberately infected them with cold viruses and then watched, meticulously, what happened next.

Over more than four decades, thousands of volunteers passed through the unit. The appeal was modest: a quiet stay in the English countryside, some pocket money, and the odd knowledge that one had contributed to science by catching a cold on purpose. For the researchers, the arrangement was invaluable. In a controlled setting, they could measure precisely how the virus was transmitted, how long it took to produce symptoms, and how the illness ran its course.

The unit’s long-serving director, David Tyrrell, oversaw much of this work and became one of the leading virologists of his era 9. Under his direction the unit clarified the basic timeline of a cold. It typically takes somewhere between eight and twelve hours after infection before the first symptoms appear, and by the time you feel that initial scratch in the throat, you have already begun shedding virus. In other words, you become contagious before you feel sick, which is precisely why colds spread so efficiently through offices, classrooms, and households. The people passing the virus along often do not yet know they carry it.

The unit’s researchers also mapped how the body eventually wins. It generally takes the immune system three to five days to gain the upper hand, at which point antibodies that specifically recognize the invading strain begin to neutralize it in earnest. Most colds resolve on their own within seven to ten days. The trouble, and the reason the cold has never been conquered, lies in the narrowness of the victory. The antibodies your body builds are exquisitely specific. They recognize the exact strain you just fought and offer little protection against the next one. With well over a hundred rhinovirus types in circulation, plus scores of other cold-causing viruses, immunity to one does almost nothing to shield you from the rest. You can recover fully from a cold one week and catch a different one the next. This staggering genetic variety is the central obstacle to a universal vaccine. There is no single target to aim at, only a moving crowd of them.

What the cold weather actually does

Generations of parents have warned that going out with wet hair, or without a coat, or into a cold wind, will give you a cold. For most of the twentieth century, scientists dismissed this as folklore. Cold weather does not cause colds, they insisted, viruses do, and the two have nothing to do with each other. The old wisdom, it turns out, was half right in a way nobody quite expected.

In 2015, researchers at Yale published a study showing that cooler temperatures inside the nose measurably weaken the local immune defenses 10. When the cells lining the nasal passages are chilled, they mount a feebler response against invading viruses, essentially lowering the guard at exactly the point where rhinoviruses like to enter. The cold air does not put the virus inside you. But it does make the entryway easier to breach. A drop in temperature at the nose gives any virus already present a better chance of establishing itself.

This helps explain the familiar winter surge in colds, though the temperature effect is only part of the story. The larger driver is behavioral. When it turns cold, people gather indoors, close the windows, and share the same warm, recirculated air for hours at a time. Crowded together in heated rooms, we hand viruses from person to person far more readily than we do in the open air of summer. The season does not conjure the virus. It arranges the conditions under which the virus thrives, and it quietly softens our first line of defense.

The misery is the medicine

Once you understand that the symptoms of a cold are the immune response rather than the disease, the whole experience takes on a different meaning. The congestion, the running nose, the sore throat, the mild fever, the heaviness in the limbs: each is a tool being used against the invader. The swelling recruits defenders. The mucus flushes the enemy out. The fever raises the temperature past the virus’s comfort. The fatigue is the body’s way of forcing you to rest so that it can pour its energy into the fight.

This reframing carries a practical edge. Reflexively suppressing every symptom is not always the harmless comfort it seems. Aggressively lowering a mild fever, for instance, removes one of the body’s advantages and may in some cases prolong the infection rather than shorten it. This is not an argument against relief. There is no virtue in suffering for its own sake, and medicines that ease discomfort have their place, particularly when symptoms interfere with sleep and sleep is itself part of the cure. But it is worth remembering what those symptoms are and why they exist before treating them as pure malfunction.

The honest truth about the common cold is that there is very little medicine can do to defeat it, and very little it needs to do. The illness resolves on its own in a week to ten days because the immune system, given time, almost always wins. Rest, fluids, and patience are not consolation prizes offered in the absence of a real cure. They are, quite literally, the treatment. They give the body the conditions it needs to finish a job it already knows how to do.

So the next time you wake with that scratch in the throat, and the day slides into aching, stuffy misery, it is worth pausing to consider what is actually happening beneath the surface. You are not falling apart. Somewhere in the lining of your nose, a war is being fought in your name, with weapons refined over hundreds of millions of years of evolution. The discomfort you feel is the sound of that battle. Your body is not broken. It is winning a fight you will never see.

Watch the companion essay on YouTube
— Companion videoThe same essay, told visually. About seven minutes.

Sources

  1. Heikkinen, T. and Jarvinen, A., The common cold, The Lancet, 2003. — https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(03)12162-9/fulltext
  2. Jacobs, S. E. et al., Human rhinoviruses, Clinical Microbiology Reviews, 2013. — https://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/cmr.00077-12
  3. Price, W. H., The isolation of a new virus associated with respiratory clinical disease in humans, PNAS, 1956. — https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.42.12.892
  4. Palmenberg, A. C. et al., Sequencing and analyses of all known human rhinovirus genomes, Science, 2009. — https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.1165557
  5. Turner, R. B., The common cold, in Mandell, Douglas, and Bennett’s Principles and Practice of Infectious Diseases, Elsevier, 2015. — https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7152197/
  6. Gwaltney, J. M. et al., Rhinovirus infections in an industrial population, JAMA, 1966. — https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/article-abstract/657149
  7. Evans, S. S. et al., Fever and the thermal regulation of immunity, Nature Reviews Immunology, 2015. — https://www.nature.com/articles/nri3843
  8. Tyrrell, D. A. J. and Fielder, M., Cold Wars: The Fight Against the Common Cold, Oxford University Press, 2002. — https://global.oup.com/academic/product/cold-wars-9780192632852
  9. MRC Common Cold Unit, historical overview, Wellcome Collection / Medical Research Council archives. — https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_Cold_Unit
  10. Foxman, E. F. et al., Temperature-dependent innate defense against the common cold virus limits viral replication at warm temperature, PNAS, 2015. — https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1411030112

Related reading

More from the Body edition →