The Cartographers of the Mind

There is an examination in London so difficult that it has been compared to a medical degree, so demanding that most people who begin it never finish. It has no textbook you can cram the night before, no multiple-choice section, no way to bluff. To pass, you must hold an entire city inside your head: roughly 25,000 streets, tens of thousands of landmarks, and the fastest route between any two points a stranger might name. The test is called, with characteristic English understatement, The Knowledge. And the people who pass it are not scholars or memory athletes. They drive taxis.

For most of the twentieth century, the story ended there. A curious profession, a fearsome exam, a piece of London folklore. But at the turn of the millennium a neuroscientist decided to look inside the heads of these drivers, and what she found upended a belief that had governed brain science for a hundred years. The adult brain, it turned out, was not the fixed and finished object everyone had assumed. It could still grow. And in one small corner, in these particular men and women, it had grown measurably larger than in almost anyone else alive.

This is not a metaphor. It was visible on a scanner, quantifiable in cubic millimeters, and it changed the way we understand what a life of practice does to the organ that makes us who we are.

A Belief Set in Stone

To appreciate why the finding mattered, it helps to understand the dogma it displaced. For generations, the standard account of the human brain was one of slow, irreversible decline. You were born with a full complement of neurons, the reasoning went, and from there it was all downhill. Childhood was a window of astonishing malleability, the years in which language, motor skills, and the basic architecture of cognition were laid down. But once that window closed, the structure hardened. The adult brain was a cathedral: magnificent, complete, and no longer under construction.

This view had the weight of authority behind it. Santiago Ramon y Cajal, the Spanish anatomist who won a Nobel Prize for mapping the nervous system and is often called the father of modern neuroscience, wrote in the early 1900s that in the adult brain “the nerve paths are something fixed, ended, immutable. Everything may die, nothing may be regenerated.” ¹ He allowed himself a small hope that future science might overturn this, but for decades it stood as received wisdom. Growth was for the young. Adults could learn facts, but the hardware itself was locked.

The trouble with a comfortable assumption is that it stops people from testing it. And so the assumption held, largely unexamined, until a young cognitive neuroscientist at University College London began to wonder whether it was true. Her name was Eleanor Maguire, and her particular interest was a small, curled structure buried deep on each side of the brain: the hippocampus, named for its resemblance to a seahorse.

The Seahorse and the Map

The hippocampus is one of the most studied structures in all of neuroscience, and for good reason. It sits at the crossroads of two things that feel central to being human: memory and navigation. Damage it, and a person may lose the ability to form new long-term memories, as the famous patient known as H.M. did after surgeons removed his hippocampi in an attempt to cure his epilepsy. He could hold a thought for a minute or two, then it was gone forever.

But the hippocampus does more than store the past. It builds our sense of where we are. In the 1970s, the neuroscientist John O’Keefe discovered specialized cells in the rat hippocampus that fired only when the animal occupied a particular spot in its environment. He called them place cells, and the discovery, which later won him a share of a Nobel Prize, suggested something remarkable: that the brain constructs an internal map of physical space, a cognitive representation of the world we move through. ² The hippocampus, in other words, is where our mental cartography lives.

Maguire reasoned that if she wanted to study spatial memory in its most extreme form, she needed to find people who used it more intensely than anyone on Earth. People whose entire livelihood depended on carrying a vast, detailed map inside their skulls. It did not take long to arrive at an answer. In the heart of the city where she worked, thousands of people had spent years doing exactly that. She found her subjects behind the wheel of a black cab.

The Knowledge

To understand the demand The Knowledge places on the mind, consider what it actually asks. A candidate must memorize every street within a six-mile radius of Charing Cross, the traditional center of London. That means the tangled medieval knot of the old city, the Georgian squares, the Victorian sprawl, and everything in between: some 25,000 streets, along with the hospitals, hotels, theaters, restaurants, parks, and monuments that a passenger might want to reach. There is no GPS in the examination room. There are no maps. There is only the candidate, an examiner, and the expectation that when named two points anywhere in the city, the candidate can recite the shortest legal route between them, turn by turn, from memory.

Preparing for this takes, on average, three to four years. Aspiring cabbies spend their days weaving through the city on scooters, clipboards fixed to their handlebars, tracing and retracing routes until the map is burned into memory. They quiz each other. They fail examinations and return months later to try again. The dropout rate is punishing; most who begin never earn the license. Those who do have accomplished a feat of memory almost without parallel in ordinary working life.

Here, Maguire understood, was a natural experiment nature had already run. If any human brain would show the marks of intense, sustained spatial learning, it would be the brain of a London cabbie. “If any brain would change,” the logic went, “it would be theirs.”

What the Scanner Showed

In 2000, Maguire and her colleagues published the study that would make the London taxi driver a fixture of neuroscience textbooks. ³ They used magnetic resonance imaging to examine the brains of sixteen licensed male cab drivers and compared them with a group of men of similar age who did not drive taxis. Then they measured the hippocampus.

The result was striking. In the drivers, the posterior hippocampus, the rear portion of the structure, was significantly larger than in the control group. And there was a subtler pattern hidden in the data, one that mattered enormously. The correlation ran with experience: the more years a man had spent driving a cab, the larger his posterior hippocampus tended to be. The brain, it appeared, had not simply been big to begin with. It seemed to have kept building, year after year, as the map inside it grew richer and more detailed.

It was as if the organ had reshaped itself to fit the demands of the job. But a skeptic could raise an obvious and serious objection. Correlation is not causation. Perhaps the study had the story backward. Perhaps people who happened to be born with larger, more capable hippocampi were simply the ones who succeeded at a task requiring extraordinary spatial memory. The taxi trade might be selecting for a pre-existing trait rather than creating a new one. Chicken, or egg? The 2000 study, powerful as it was, could not say for certain.

Watching a Brain Change

To settle the question, Maguire needed something harder to obtain than a single snapshot. She needed to watch the same brains change over time. Together with her collaborator Katherine Woollett, she designed a study of remarkable patience, one that would take four years to complete. ⁴

They recruited seventy-nine trainees who were just beginning their preparation for The Knowledge, before any of them had passed. At the outset, they scanned every brain. The baseline result was reassuring and important: at the start, the trainees’ hippocampi looked no different from those of a control group. There was no sign that the people drawn to the profession already possessed unusually large memory structures. Whatever they had, they had in ordinary measure.

Then the trainees did what trainees do. They studied for years, threading through the city, memorizing routes, sitting examinations. And they did what most Knowledge candidates do: the majority did not make it. Of the seventy-nine who began, only thirty-nine eventually qualified for the license. The rest either failed or gave up along the way. This attrition, painful for the candidates, was scientifically invaluable. It gave the researchers two groups that had started out identical but diverged: those who had successfully built the map, and those who had not.

Four years after the first scans, the team imaged every brain again. The results, published in 2011, delivered the answer Maguire had been chasing. The trainees who passed The Knowledge had grown more gray matter in the posterior hippocampus over the intervening years. The trainees who failed, and those who had abandoned the effort, showed no such change; their brains looked much as they had at the start, and much like the controls.

The conclusion was as clean as neuroscience ever gets. The difference could not be explained by selection, because at baseline the groups had been the same. It could not be explained by some general feature of driving a cab, because the failed candidates had studied too. The only thing that separated the growers from the rest was the successful acquisition of the knowledge itself. The learning had built the structure. The word for this phenomenon, once heretical and now central to the science of the brain, is neuroplasticity: the capacity of the adult brain to physically remodel itself in response to how it is used.

The Price of Specialization

It would be a tidy story if it ended there, with a triumphant vindication of the trainable brain. But nature rarely offers something for nothing, and the taxi driver studies contained a quieter, more sobering finding.

The drivers’ gains in spatial memory appeared to come at a cost. In follow-up testing, cabbies performed worse than non-drivers on certain tasks involving the formation of new visual memories, particularly the kind of information associated with the front portion of the hippocampus. ⁵ It was as though the brain, given a finite volume of tissue to work with, had reallocated its resources. The posterior hippocampus, home to the spatial map, had expanded. The anterior hippocampus appeared to have given something up in exchange.

This is a principle worth sitting with. The brain is not an infinitely expandable warehouse. It occupies a fixed skull, works within a fixed energy budget, and to devote more of itself to one skill is, in some measure, to devote less to another. To specialize is to sacrifice. The London cabbie carries a map of the city more detailed than most of us could dream of, and pays for it, in a small and specific way, elsewhere. The finding reframes expertise not as pure accumulation but as a kind of sculpting, in which some features are carved deeper by making others shallower.

The Tool in Your Pocket

All of this arrives at an uncomfortable question, and it concerns the device most of us now carry everywhere. If sustained spatial effort builds the hippocampus, what happens when we hand that effort over to a machine?

When you follow turn-by-turn directions from a navigation app, your brain does something very different from what a cabbie’s does. You are not building a map; you are following one. Research using brain imaging has found that when people navigate by GPS, the hippocampus effectively goes quiet, disengaging from the work of route-planning that it performs when we find our own way. ⁶ A separate body of research has reported that heavier lifetime reliance on satellite navigation is associated with worse spatial memory, though such findings show correlation rather than proof of cause. ⁷

It is important not to overstate this. There is no good evidence that using a map app is shrinking anyone’s brain, and the honest scientific position is one of caution. What the research does suggest is more modest and more interesting: that the effort of finding your own way, the act of building and consulting an internal map, may matter more than we assumed. The hippocampus, like a muscle, responds to load. Remove the load entirely and there is nothing to respond to.

The taxi driver studies are ultimately not really about taxis. They are about the general truth that every skill we practice leaves a physical trace. The violinist’s brain devotes more territory to the fingers of the left hand. The literate brain reorganizes regions to handle the strange task of decoding symbols into sound and meaning. The cab driver grows a larger map. We are, each of us, shaped by what we repeatedly do, in tissue as much as in habit. The choices about how we spend our attention are, in a slow and literal sense, choices about what kind of brain we will end up with.

So the next time you set off through an unfamiliar city and find your way home without a screen to guide you, without a voice announcing every turn, consider what the effort is doing. Somewhere deep inside your head, in a small structure shaped like a seahorse, the work of finding your own way is being recorded. Not as a memory exactly, but as substance. And in that quiet, unnoticed labor, the seahorse grows a little larger.

Sources

1. Ramon y Cajal, S., Degeneration and Regeneration of the Nervous System, Oxford University Press, 1928. — https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Santiago_Ram%C3%B3n_y_Cajal
2. O’Keefe, J. and Dostrovsky, J., ‘The hippocampus as a spatial map,’ Brain Research, 1971. — https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-8993(71)90358-1
3. Maguire, E. A. et al., ‘Navigation-related structural change in the hippocampi of taxi drivers,’ PNAS, 2000. — https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.070039597
4. Woollett, K. and Maguire, E. A., ‘Acquiring the Knowledge of London’s layout drives structural brain changes,’ Current Biology, 2011. — https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2011.11.018
5. Maguire, E. A., Woollett, K. and Spiers, H. J., ‘London taxi drivers and bus drivers: A structural MRI and neuropsychological analysis,’ Hippocampus, 2006. — https://doi.org/10.1002/hipo.20233
6. Javadi, A. H. et al., ‘Hippocampal and prefrontal processing of network topology to simulate the future,’ Nature Communications, 2017. — https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms14652
7. Dahmani, L. and Bohbot, V. D., ‘Habitual use of GPS negatively impacts spatial memory during self-guided navigation,’ Scientific Reports, 2020. — https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-62877-0

Related reading

• The Fog Is a Signal, Not a Verdict
• The Man Who Memorized Nonsense to Understand Forgetting

More from the Mind edition →